Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerseee
Hhhmm,
As sound as Kgod's position is, I'd have to side with BT on this one. I don't think another contract is necessary. I think holding them to their oath is enough to make them squirm.
Besides, the contract seems to be unilateral and without the consent of both parties. If they contract with us, it is through written trickery and verbal swordplay. They don't have to admit to tricking you when they have your consent. Let me give you an example:
To get a lawyer and for them to call you a client is the kind of trickery I speak of. If you are a client and a client is of unsound mind, how are you sane enough to seek their guidance in the first place? Were you of unsound mind when you went to them? Or were you of unsound mind after they've finished with you?
(When I say "You", that is a general term. It is directed at no one in particular)
|
Good point Jerseee.
The "client" of an attorney is presumed incompetent. That's why he will be told to be quiet if he speaks up in court.
__________________
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic." --Dresden James
|