ok, ok. lets back up. stop. please, dont go looking for them to admit the power you have. dont go looking for them to tell you what to do. when the judge sealed my records, he didnt tell me i could charge him with federal crimes for concealing documents filed with a clerk. let me try to break it down again. We all know you can fire a attorney, correct? Ok, a judge is a ATTORNEY on the bench making legal determinations, whats so hard to overstand about that. He IS NOT A JUDGE unless you bring in the oath. He is a EMPLOYEE. Read his oath, he is a government emloyee AND a judge. Theres a difference. He will NOT act as a judge unless you bind him to the oath. Now, if you dont bind him to his oath, he is acting as a government administrator who has discretion to do what he wants. thats cool, because your whole card is, he can be fired like anyone who works for you the taxpayer. They are not gonna tell you in any legal book that you can fire him. Stop looking for the law within their system, its not there for you. I almost dont wanna type anymore because i thought we had this down when we defined the meaning of sui juris in the first place. If you are sui juris, noone can make determinations for you and thats exactly what the judge is doing on the bench, he is making determinations for you, not the court, but you, the one standing there in front of him, he is representing you, thats why he can enter a plea for you, folks, we got to wake up. That man in the gown is not a neutral judicial article 3 judge. A article 3 judge doesnt pay taxes. thats one of the reasons the irs keeps a eye on them, to make sure one of them doesnt get smart on them and stop paying like they suppose to. the moment you pay taxes, you are a employee. and guess who they work for? you and me. he is no different than a public defender. man this is so simple. Please, stop getting caught up in procedures. We have enough procedure. Its admitted that when you hire a lawyer to represent you, that you are incompetant. well, what do you think the "judge" is? thats exactly why they can practice law and be on the bench at the same time. a lot of them do that obvious conflict of interest. You would think a judge cannot practice law in his private firm at the same time he is a judge. I figured it out folks, they know they aint real judges, they are practicing law from the bench and in their offices at the same time, thats why they cant be charged with the seperations of power because they are not acting in judicial capacities on the bench. thats another reason they tell the jury to judge the facts and not the law, they are telling you what the law is. case law is legislation from the bench. they are strictly acting in the legislative branch at all times and pretending its judicial. you cannot fire a real judge because he isnt representing any fictions in court, but a lawyer can only represent fictions(strawmen, corporations),and thus, can be fired by his employers. Thats why the power of attorney over the strawman is so powerful. Man, in fact, they keep telling me the only document theywill file for me in the public record is A POWER OF ATTORNEY. Thats one of the most important documents to them. They are trained to tell you that once someone else represents you, you cannot do ANYTHING on behalf of the strawman unless YOU FIRE THE LAWYER REPRESENTING HIM. In closing, why do you think they appoint attornies all the time as temporary judges? i forgot what they call them, judge pro tem or something of that nature. on the contract issue. Blacktruth, in my copy of blacks law dictionary, (8th edition) they have listed apprxiomately 154 DIFFERENT TYPES OF CONTRACTS LISTED! An oath falls under just about all of them. Implied, unilateral, man i could go on. In fact, one of the documents they sealed in my case was the acceptance of their oath as a contract with me. they didnt say boo. they know its a binding contract with the people. They been telling us since kindergarden that the government is the servant so why even question your power to fire them. Im not saying they gonna go, oo we, he just cited legal code such and such, so i guess im fired. you have to move the court yourself. thats where i stand with my documents. This is the most important thing im gonna tell you. I sent a writ of error to them after they sealed my case. in the writ, i stated to them, thanx for agreeing with me that my judgment is void because they agreed by not rebutting a affidavit i sent them. The clerk filed it into my case (they afraid not to now.) in fact she said, file it, the judge will handle it. now, guess what the judge did this time. im sitting here with a filed copy of my writ explaining that my case is void, but when i checked the docket of the case a month later, there is no record of my filing the writ even though im sitting here with a filed stamped copy. they are hoping i just go away. now,what im gonna do is file the notice of void judgment into the public record. im not waiting on the minister (judge) to do it for me, he gonna have his hands full with the lawsuit im gonna file and inquire as to why ive got all these stamped documents concealed and removed from the records. thats why i love judicial review. stop bringing them controversies to decide on. settle the controversy in the private. Ive told folks numerous times about a incident down in atlanta back around 2000 where i witnessed the county nolle prosecute 12 inmates who had gotten a copy of a self executing contract and had it served on the chief judge and county district attorney. folks, you gotta realize your power and use it.