[weishaupt1776]

Chuck's got a good heart, but I believe that he is lost.

He believes that he is a U.S. citizen & believes that he is protected under the 14th Amendment.
Check out this interview here:
http://www.commonlawvenue.com/People...rviewChuck.htm

The 14th Amendment forces the presumption on everyone that they are a defacto U.S. Citizen until rebutted.
The UCC FS and $2.00 will get you a cup of Starbucks, but WILL NOT help in correcting your status as a dejure native of your land.
You can also say, prove I'm a U.S. citizen. But that fails when you are a plaintiff & the Burden of proof is on you.

Check out some of my posts regarding this
http://forum.suijuris.net/showthread.php?t=224&page=3

The answer is in the actual language of the Amendment itself.
One needs not read mile of case cites on it, which were intentionally propagated to force the U.S. Citizen presumption.

Chuck's processes & mechanisms are detailed, well planned, & well researched. The only problem is that he is not operating with the PROPER FOUNDATION.
His foundation is that he is a U.S. Citizen who is guaranteed protection under the 14th Amendment.

This is built on sinking sand because the 14th Amendment creates defacto citizens who vote, which makes them enemies of their dejure state. This creates insurrection and rebellion, which now justifies D.C. enforcing emergency war powers. Some of these defacto citizens become Senators & reps which amounts to a defacto Nation which can now exercise war powers because people are rebelling against their dejure state nationality & dejure state government.

Now your rights are suspended and you are not guaranteed any rights under the 9th 10th Amendment.