View Single Post
  #1  
Old 04-06-2005, 10:50 AM
weishaupt1776's Avatar
weishaupt1776 weishaupt1776 is offline
The Outta Commissiona
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,417
Reconciling Methods

HB & I chat quite a bit & something that comes up in our conversations is "How do you incorporate all of these methods?"

I tell ya, right outtta the gate we discussed Reconciling Cornforth's 4 legs of Jurisdiction W/ Marc Steven's Bear Trap Questions.

So far, the only people I know(off the top of my head) of who may be versed in both of these methods are HB, KAOS, AKIRA, ICE, SJ, and KITCHIE.

So Here's Cornforths Four Legs of the Jurisdiction Table(with the help of Jim. Jim, where you at, man? We miss you.) :
  • 1. Party 1 with standing before the court.(Do they have a legitimate pleading?)

    2. Party 2 with standing before the court.

    3. Some breach of a law(tort), contract or duty.(That's what makes a legitimate pleading referred to in leg 1.)

    4. Evidence submitted by a competent witness.(That's How the court will know whether or not there has been a breach or law broken

Before we get all Marc Stevensed out, Let's really understand Leg 1.
__________________
THE DOWNLOADS SECTION IS BROKEN & WILL NEVER BE FIXED, SO STOP BUGGING ME !

www.pacinlaw.org ~ www.pacgroups.us
Multi multa, non omnia novit = Many men know many things, no one knows everything.
The De jure Political Group: www.statenationals.net
Do you have concerns about America? www.redamendment.net
Is the government acting in your interest? www.notmygovernment.us
Have you been Deprogrammed? www.deprogram.us


DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE NOW !!

Reply With Quote