Suijuris Forums - View Single Post

James · #10 03-14-2004, 09:30 PM

Randy<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o

></o

>
&<o

></o

>

>>I'm back: Ah. Realized that irs/state tax agents refer to ssn as "social security numbers" AND "account" number, and when it's "ss" they use dashed, but NO dashed when referring to my "account."& So I DO have an "account," of some kind, somewhere....<<

Can’t help with Norwegian language/grammar

, but if you stay here in America I can offer a little help with the English language/grammar.
>>tax agents<< The word-tax is a noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-agents. There is no such phraseology; therefore, this is a false conveyance of language and a felony. Thus, this language properly read would be “non-existing agents.” <o

></o

>
>>"social security numbers"<< Social Security is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun- numbers. There is no such phraseology; therefore, this is a false conveyance of language and a felony. Thus, this language properly read would be non-existing numbers. <o

></o

>
>>"account" number<< The word account is a noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-number. There is no such phraseology; therefore, this is a false conveyance of language and a felony. Thus, this language properly read would be non-existing number.<o

></o

>
&<o

></o

>
These grammatical-amalgamations-bastardized into the fabric of our language were to promote common usage, and therefore, gradually juxtapose the substance of our language to create a false system of injustice that mirrors our proper system of law.<o

></o

>
All statutes are replete&with false conveyance of language. Willful false statements are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, pursuant to Law and “Title 18 United States Code Annotated § [/i]1001 (a)(1), (2) & (3).”<o

></o

>