Quote:
|
Originally Posted by weishaupt1776
Jon has beefed up his site. Much more organized and comprehensive
|
Yet not comprehensive enough when he's posting what looks like the full text of a case:
He publishes a case here:
http://www.netside.net/~c3i/fong.htm
yet, when you look up the case with the court of appeals:
http://www.3dca.flcourts.org/3d02-3097.pdf
you'll notice that on John's web page, he omits the last paragraph of the opinion, but still manages to get the footnotes that appear below it. Here's what he didn't publish:
Code:
We find the other issues raised in Fong’s appeal, as well as
the issue raised in the Town’s cross-appeal, to be without merit.
Accordingly, the trial court’s order is reversed as to the
aforementioned errors and remanded for further proceedings
consistent with this opinion, and affirmed in all other respects.
I don't see any reason why you wouldn't publish that last paragraph. However, not publishing it, without even noting that part of the opinion was omitted, seems to be to be extremely dishonest.
Frankly, when I see stuff like that, I don't see any difference between this guy any every other state-controlled scumbag lawyer out there.