|
cont'd
Form 4029:* Application for Exemption from Self-Employment Tax, Claim for Refund and Waiver of Benefits: The form, which is in total compliance with section 202(v) of the Act and section 1402(g) (formerly 1402(h)) of the IRC, clearly sets forth the requirements for eligibility for the tax exemption.
Furthermore; There is no requirement to supply or obtain a Social Security number (SSN) to anyone for any reason. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has consistently stated as follows:
The SS Act does not require a person to have a SSN to live and work in the United States, nor does it require an SSN simply for the purpose of having one.* This would suggest it is voluntary.* Paying into this system therefore can not be mandatory.
The SSA only says that if someone works without a SSN the agency cannot correctly credit the person's account for the period in which they work without a number.
If a person decided they do not need or want an SSN, they may request that SSA delete the record of their SSN application. Since the SSA policy states that in special situations, SSA will delete the "application information from the SSN record," the agency should honor all such requests.
What law makes it mandatory to pay SS Tax?
Second paragraph; “Similarly, people cannot withdraw the Social Security taxes that they have already paid. Social Security taxes paid by employees and employers are not placed in individual accounts but are pooled to pay benefits to eligible workers and their families. Benefits are paid only on the basis of a voluntary application.”
Please show me where I requested to withdraw SS taxes already paid.* I did not request any of the taxes I have already paid.* I requested a correction, a change of status.* Does Charles has difficulty understanding English?*
What Charles has indicated is that everyone pays SS tax, even though there is no law, but only those that voluntary apply for a SSN get benefits.* But if one does not apply for a SSN how is the tax applied towards a specific number?* I find this inconsistent and therefore a complete lie as no law has been established making it mandatory for one to pay SS tax.* If there is please notify me of the Statute.
Even though I have enclosed a completed Certificate of Foreign Status, Substitute W-8 as per John Lyons, (Assistant Commissioner International of Foreign Operations, Office of the Director of Foreign Operations in Washington, DC), indicated was needed in order to officially change the incorrect status on SS-5 from “U. S. Citizen” to “Other”, meaning “American Citizen.” if this department is unwilling to change my status to other to reflect my correct American Citizenship status, this will establish to being subjugated into slavery of which is involuntary servitude and Unconstitutional.** Therefore,what law prevents me form voluntarily withdrawing from the program all together based on SSA-521, and then reapplying for a new number with a correct other status? Or signing a waiver?* OR going exempt under the law? OR requesting that my number be deleted?
Further more, I never volunteered into this system, I thought that was plain, in the letter.* The Hospital, I assume, without my consent, while I was a minor, set this up.* Therefore my Volunteered assumption is incorrect, I never volunteered.* And as Charles is stating that I did volunteered- PROVE IT! Therefore, I request a copy of the original application under the Freedom of information act.
Further, why can one not end the voluntary participation?* Please show me the legal requirements, especially in light that Charles said it was a voluntary participation.* Voluntary is define as:
acting or done of one's own free will without valuable consideration or legal obligation
implies freedom and spontaneity of choice or action without external compulsion
proceeding from the will or from one's own choice or consent
unconstrained by interference
having power of free choice
self-determining
I also want to point out that several people have already won court cases objecting on religious grounds to State requirements for a SSN as a condition:
Leahy v. District of Columbia: Circuit Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg, (now a U.S. Supreme Court Justice), wrote the Court's opinion upholding John C. Leahy's religious objection to providing his social security number in order to get a driver's license.
Five plaintiffs sued the City of Los Angeles, on religious objection grounds, objecting to the State's requirement that driver's license applicants must provide a social security number as a condition to getting a license. They won the case in the State Superior Court. A similar case is pending in Alabama on appeal
Social Security Number Court Cases
Callahan v. Woods 1981; religious objection to requirement that a minor must obtain a social security number to receive federal benefits.
Callahan v. Woods 1984; objected to a requirement that he get a social security number for his minor daughter.
Yeager v. Hackensack 1985; case based on constitutional and Privacy Act objections to a New Jersey independent water company requirement for SSN.
Leahy v. District of Columbia 1987; religious objection to the required use of social security number.
Greidinger v. Davis 1993; objection to requirement to divulge a SSN as a condition to vote.
I want to point out that I too have very strong religious convictions against using the social security number, even more so when it reflects an incorrect status, or when Federal servants of the people refusing to adhere to proper procedures.* Change my status to Other!
Third paragraph: “The Social Security Administration (SSA) is required by law (at section 205 of the Social Security Act) to maintain records of workers' earnings and to establish any other records necessary to carry out our responsibilities under the Social Security Act. Because many people have the same name, or change their name, a reliable and permanent system was needed to distinguish one individual from another in our records. The Social Security account number system was established to meet that need.”
What does this have to do with my request of changing my status to ‘Other’ or the fact that this agency is negligent and liable for maintaining correct information and refusing to fulfill the duty of this administration in correcting or specifically responding to the charge that members of this office are not doing their diligence in maintaining correct information?*
This means absolutely nothing to me and has nothing to do with my request or about this administration absolute failure and derelict of duty to fulfill the obligations and duty concerning me.* Trickery: lots of words, probably correct and yet has nothing to do with my request of changing my statues to ‘Other’, thus signifying nothing.
|