View Single Post
  #12  
Old 05-08-2005, 11:20 AM
Akira's Avatar
Akira Akira is offline
Sui Juris Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Maine state
Posts: 873
To All,

Thanks... it's good to be back.. although my 'plate' is still quite full... it will probably be at least another month or so before I can contribute to the degree I used to...

I actually won this case in March... but after 2+ years of studing every spare minute and a few trips to the slammer, I was due for a small vacation ! It took a few days, just to come to terms with the fact that I won ! lol


Seeker,

You are essentially correct. The court will leave no stone unturned, in an attempt to presume jurisdiction.

In my case, it was the request for jury trial, and subsequent move to superior court (to get away from the moron judges in district court).

This is the reason I first addressed who I REALLY was... then attacked the misnomer, then attacked the presumption I was a corporate or legal entity created by congress, that anything I said was intended TO BE TESTIMONY, or that I was there to CONDUCT BUSINESS and / or CONTRACT with ANYONE !

Your friend goofed because:

An UNREBUTTED STATEMENT, whether written or verbal, STANDS AS TRUTH !

SILENCE IS AQUIESENCE !

By not saying a word, by not challenging every word that was contrary to his position, your friend ACCEPTED what was said as TRUTH ! and VOLUNTEERED ! He allowed the DA's words, as well as the judge's words to stand !

You must object to everything you disagree with !

All I did was anticipate their presumptions, based on study and experience.

They will also use your answering the simplest questions to assume your aquiesence to their jursidiction. Just answering a question like "where do you work" with a volunteered answer is enough....

You must take command at every step !

When the judge was so very sweet and unassuming, and asked me "would you mind answering a few questions for me?" (it was the first clue I had, that I had him where I wanted him... a night and day difference to previous encounters) HE WAS OFFERING TO CONTRACT !!! So I modified the the offer with a condition, which negated the very reason he was trying to contract... see? ("On the condition that they are not used as a tool to usurp my rights and/or otherwise impose your authority on me")

They are the devil incarnate. They are his minions, and do his bidding. Make no mistake ! Remember the early Loony Tune cartoons, from the 30's, where the Devil always asked to sign the contract? Bingo !

I probably seem a bit fanatical here... but it s really that simple... and they will use the simplest of invitations, even implied ones, to latch on and leech !

Remember, the ONLY God sanctioned corporation in the world, is the family ! All others are seen as leeches and are scorned by God, as they produce nothing, and are born of, and exist off, the labor of others.

Bottom line...

You must be aware of their 'law' and procedures, but you must KNOW common law... that is the dejure state citizen's remedy...

You are correct... Petition to Dismiss is the correct approach in common law.. as opposed to Motion to Dismiss... which is a statuatory procedure... but frankly, because, despite all the hours of study, I still considered myself a 'newbie', I went with something I knew had a huge chance of winning (if it works.. don't fix it). Now in hindsight, I may change the name of the doc... But, it's a minor point.... as long as you rebut the presumption, you have nothing to fear !

Hope this helps !!

For HIS Glory,
Akira
__________________
Akira = Akira-
Counselor in Law (student) - I live it, I don't 'practice'
No post is ever intended as 'legal' advice. Lawful perspectives discussed openly.
"Pro and Con are opposites, this is plainly seen.
If progress means 'to move forward', what does congress mean?" - Nipsy Russel

"It's not the will to win, it's the will to prepare to win." - Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote