
08-11-2005, 06:05 AM
|
 |
The Outta Commissiona
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Republic
Posts: 5,322
|
|
|
day 3 Continued
#1 The first regulations he read was that of 1939 about the ???Meaning of Income.??? #2 Then he looked at the regulation on ???exclusions to income???. These 2 regulations helped him develop the belief that there is income that is excluded because of the Constitutional limitations on government power.
Exhibit #3 Next he read the 1924 income tax regulation (article 71) which also stated that there is some income that is excluded from taxation due to the fundamental law. Then he looked at the Black???s law dictionary for a term that says:
???when law apply to a specific issue, it necessarily excludes others not mentioned.
Then in the 1917 Gould decision, he understood that government can not tax you beyond what the law allows and if there is any doubt, it must be ruled in favor of the citizen.
*
#7 Exhibit says that not only Congress has the power to tax, but the power to regulate commerce which means Congress can tax foreign commerce.
*
#11 an IRS regulation came across it in Bell???s article in 1997.
#12 ???*** ??? *********** ???********** ???******** ???***** ???** ??? **** ???******* ???**** ???**** ???
*
Section 1 and 61 regulations and index tell you to go to section 861 for a determination of what is taxable or not.
*
#17 1040 Income Tax form says that we must report our foreign source income, but does not mention domestic source income.
*
The first report on his research, written in 1998 was only 12 pages long and by 2000 had grown to 60 pages. * He met Dr. Thomas Calyton in 2000 and Thomas Clayton told him that they should have their own web site www.taxableincome.net .
*
Judge ruled that tomorrow Larken can show at least 5 minutes of his video, without sound, but not at the same moment that he is talking about it. We finished today at 4:30 PM. ******
Yours in truth, freedom and justice,
Peymon, Ross, Harry and Ken
|