View Single Post
  #3  
Old 08-25-2005, 10:48 PM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterduke
There must be grounds for some motions to be filed here, research your state civil rules and see if they have a comprehensive version (usually by a private
publisher, here in mich. a co. called ICLE publishes several books in a binder form so they are easy to make copies of what you need. They even have one that is titled "handling the collection case in michigan, a creditors guide" which is very good at showing just how you can have your very own debt attrny bizzness, step by step. But it does show you their strategys and the laws they use to base their attacks on) There are many different motions availble, and with nobody seeming to know who's on first or whats on second seems there is cause, for a "flurrey of motions" Just know that they use
a sucessful tactic of laws that actually "throws" the burden of proof from they the plaintiff to you. Placing the burden of pursuing a particular objection
on the defendant, Substantially reducing the plaintiffs burden of making the case. in mich they use MCL 600.2145 as their weapon to wedge you with.
As "Proofs" of account stated. Thats all they need to file a complaint with the
typical Two elements for a valid cause of action jive, the account, you owe, they sue, they win 99% of the time. If roy b. was a real person instead of a
"bar member" he could do much to shine the light of day on this neither world
of debt attny/court scum, of course he won't, because his first alligance is to that "british accredited registry" and as such is a foreign agent. (If there was such a thing as "nations" and "countries" to begin with, which most people believe there is) the other way of proving they don't really exist is Rule 9 A "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted"... you can't sue the state if your car gets stolen because they (gov, courts, floatsam, etc.)
have no duty to protect you so there is only one element and you need two
for a valid cause. Yes the car is stolen, but they don't have any obligatioin to protect so Bye, Bye. But Big Ol' Bean will sit in his black nightie several feet off the floor and "adminster the appearance of justice" because thats all he 's got to do, not actualy adminster justice, just make it look good, thats all
Its the same in every court. Who are these "People of the State of ***"??
these "people" who have issued the "summons and complaint" where are they? Weasels in a "law office" don't seem to be the people of the state of anything, neither does the black robed wonder, and his endless supply of
doughnut gobblers who as "beans bretheren" will "authorize" to use deadly force to bring you before the "bench". Sorry for the rant, Aloha
Well said, masterduke.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote