Quote:
|
Originally Posted by truth4all
This is clearly a LETTER to the Defendant from WOLPOFF AND ABRAMSON.
They can word it anyway they want to word it in their letter.
|
And it is meaningless if they haven't actually filed a motion to dismiss.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by truth4all
If Wolpoff and Abramson filed a Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice, they DO NOT HAVE TO CALL IT A MOTION in a letter they write to the Defendant,
and this letter was PROBABLY written by some paralegal that doesn't know his Motions from his........Requests. (to be polite)
If the Defendant wants a copy of the MOTION, filed with the court, all he has to do is go to the court and REQUEST a copy of it. !
|
He shouldn't have to. Depending on local rules, copies of motions are supposed to be served.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by truth4all
Heck, YOU could probably find it online with the information given in the POST and post the whole case along with the MOTION (or lack of one) for all to see !
How about it BEAN? Why don't you PROVE he's confused?
I had one DISMISSED and never got notice of it from ANYONE, not the court NOR the attorney !
I found it online, went and paid for my copy of it at the court !
If WOLPOFF and ABRAMSON HAVEN'T "Motioned To Dismiss Without Prejudice" as stated in their letter, then this Defendant has some pretty powerful ammo of FURTHER fraud by W & A and should file his OWN Motion To Dismiss based soley on that letter !!! INVHO !!!
|
They aren't allowed to assume he has access via the 'net, let alone that it serves as an equivalent to service, and IMHO he should do exactly that just to make sure the court orders the dismissal and he has a copy of the order. That letter won't stand the scrutiny of a mortgage underwriter or CRA, they'll want to see a copy of the court's dismissal order.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by truth4all
I think you REALLY need some fishing time, Bean.
You are already "out to lunch", and the fish aren't taking to your bait around here !
|
Sure. Leave him out there ASSUMING a firm like W&A has their act together, let alone acts honorably on behalf of their opponents. I'd be willing to bet a margarita (on the rocks, with salt, thank you) they haven't actually filed it yet.