Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean
And it is meaningless if they haven't actually filed a motion to dismiss.
He shouldn't have to. Depending on local rules, copies of motions are supposed to be served.
They aren't allowed to assume he has access via the 'net, let alone that it serves as an equivalent to service, and IMHO he should do exactly that just to make sure the court orders the dismissal and he has a copy of the order. That letter won't stand the scrutiny of a mortgage underwriter or CRA, they'll want to see a copy of the court's dismissal order.
Sure. Leave him out there ASSUMING a firm like W&A has their act together, let alone acts honorably on behalf of their opponents. I'd be willing to bet a margarita (on the rocks, with salt, thank you) they haven't actually filed it yet.
|
You lose !
09/02/2005 Disposition - Withdrawn without Prejudice Louis J. Presenza NICHOLI H CARDWELL (D1)
and DEFENDANT was smart enough to file the letter with the court where WOLPOFF and ABRAMSON stated DISMISSSED without Prejudice.
http://claims.courtapps.com/servlet/...cketID=1835751
Go fishing !