From my reply in the Guardian Ad Litem thread
here.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Akira
Regardless of what is best for the child, or the parents, you can rest assured, their decision will be what is best for the state, first.
|
Why have the expense of two court sessions, when one will do?
The answer is the same.... It's what's best for the STATE. :mad:
Honestly, I wish it were otherwise...
On another note.... You may want to check your states rules of evidence.
I know lawyers can't testify (Trinsey v Pagliaro, 229 F.Supp. 647) and I believe, in most states, only the injured party, or a competent 3rd party witness (with
first hand knowledge), may enter evidence against you, into the court record, unless both parties agree to allow it, and you should not. So, when the Department of Revenue's employee tries to, object !
Look it up, so you can quote the rule, when the time comes.
For HIS Glory,
Akira