Thank you, Ice, and Randy!
Randy, the consequences I have suffered in the past many would say weren't worth the fight. It was my own ignorance of the fraud being perpetrated that enabled these agencies to do what they have done.
I'm proud of you for the stance you took to stop feeding this Beast. And I'm sorry to hear that after all that the Beast got the upper hand. As I mentioned, I do understand, as I have lost much to the Beast, as many do every day.
You may already understand this, however, from my studies I have ascertained that the W-4 is a negotiable instrument, ruled by negotiable instruments law, UCC.
If you sign this negotiable instrument using "without prejudice" UCC 1-207 above your signature (making your signature "conditional" as opposed to "unconditional") then you have made no promise to pay and can then mark exempt. You must then defend your stance by rebutting agency presentments with a reply to their letters within 3 days of receipt. A Revocation of signature is in order. There is more to this method and I may very well try it. If it sounds of interest to you, please see:
www.godissovereignfast.com It contains incredibly good information. I highly recommend it to all those who prize their freedom. I also highly recommend all those that can afford to do so to support Mr. Dixon in his efforts and to buy his book. It can be read prior to purchase, as it is free on the web.
I have been a fool for a very long time, and have suffered great losses because of it. I intend to turn that around if I can.
My problem is that now that I have refused to provide/disclose this number, as I no longer wish to be associated with such, my position at that franchise was filled by someone else. Because of my stance I have lost that opportunity. I have another opportunity, however, in order to get hired there (hardware store in the garden section) I need a driver's license to make deliveries, etc. If I were to attempt to obtain a driver's license they also would want a social security number.
http://www.libertymls.com/libertyactivist/dotltr.htm
this link provides some constitutional objections that have perhaps yet to be brought up in a true Article 3 court of law, or any court of "law" for that matter. It is an old link, however, I feel that the arguments are valid. If I had a little more court savvy I'd probably be up to challenging DMV on the basis of this rule interfering with my God-given rights. However, paperwork costs cash, and cash is a big obstacle for me. And is another reason the job at the hardware store is passing me by (no money to purchase a license to begin with).
thank you, Randy, for your kindness and thoughfulness. It would be an honor to correspond with you! I'll likely be doing just that! It's always nice to throw around ideas with a fellow lover of freedom!
Freedom and Peace to all,
goldphoenix