|
Re:Irs and Judges
If you look at "Objections to Evidence and Testimony", at the very end, the 5 steps to Objection are listed.& What happens when the judge "over rules" an objection? -- Eventually it goes to appeal AND THE TRIAL STOPS UNTIL THE QUESTION IS ANSWERED.& So, why didn't the attornies use this to their advantage at every possible opportunity?
And I haven't even brought up asking the judge if he were "making a legal determination or decision", which is something they could have done several times as the judge blatantly stated he was!!& Those "legal determinations and decisions" should have been CHALLENGED on the spot!& The judge REMOVED THE BURDEN OF PROOF from the prosecutor by making "legal determination and decision" -- and the attornies should not have allowed him to get away with that.
&
&
|