sui juris,


interesting thoughts.


however, i'm not sure i am on your page there.


the state would never want to admit to true ownership - that would be letting the cat outta the bag.


'sides, who'd want to "rent" their vehicle after the scam is exposed?


second, it pays the state to have code violations ("revenue").


third, possession of TITLE would be 9/10ths of the law, not simple possession.& that's like saying to any thief, hey, if you steal my thing, then i guess its yours!& (extrapolate please, no cavaling on that point)


the state really doesn't care who trades the asset around - it knows there really is no "money" and therefore no property actually gets exchanged between buyer and seller, so it is secure in its position of title holder.


BUT, since it holds the real title to the vehicle, IT WILL attempt to enforce any & all code violations incurred by the vehicle/equitable title owner.


so, YES, if you can unequivocally PROVE that you are the true title holder & not just equitable title holder, then you COULD remove the "place travel device" from their codes.&


the king cannot tax what he does not hold or own.& right?


jon