to use a well-used (and i think well-defined phrase from here) you have to rebutt the presumpption they have made.
Also, this is Tacit Procuration which is closely tied to unrebutted presumpptions which are assumed to be valid acts of a possible agent which you have NOT appointed to do your bidding (business)
Our problem is that we have to act as soon as possible to close the mouth of one who acts tacitly on our behalf.
The problem is also that since all "court" acts are done in commerce that's how they assume we are also corporations doing business in court..
It's like context-sensitive help on GUIs, Press F1 for help that is relevent to your situation, but in court the context is commercial-business unless they are told something else.
Well, i hope that helps.
(aside: a wiki-wiki would be better for providing and allowing better inter-linking of topics and comments here.
but that's *WAY* off-topic. oops
Administrator, can you ponder an alternate and incorporate such a feature?
--
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by str8razor
>>i havent done this yet, but i have been putting together somethin to put them into court to show how and why they are taxin home ownership. how is it a business.
|