Quote:
The key to your statement is rational thought.
Stu would use his philosophy, and call it science.
|
I know he often posted scientific articles for purposes of sparking a discussion, and when the discussion ensued, there were often clashes of philosophical and theosophical points of view.
Quote:
|
Look up an explanation of the scientific method and you tell me how evolution can be catagorized as science.
|
I think the scientific method has been used for purposes of attempting to support and validate the THEORY of evolution... and personally, as I've said here before, I find that the THEORY of evolution has some gaping holes in it. Creation has to be considered a theory as well, because no proof of creation exists via the scientific method, either. I am always excited by new discoveries and how they might fill in the gaps one way or the other.
I relate to the Deist perspective because belief in a Creator is based upon the indications of intelligent design which are evident in the universe... and also because no one is left out or rejected for failing to follow some particular religious practice or subscribe to some allegedly "revealed" belief system.
*