Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fulltitle
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
"Lawyers for David Letterman want a judge to quash a restraining order granted to a Santa Fe woman who contends the CBS late-night host used code words to show he wanted to marry her and train her as his co-host.
A state judge granted a temporary restraining order to Colleen Nestler, who alleged in a request filed last Thursday that Letterman has forced her to go bankrupt and caused her "mental cruelty" and "sleep deprivation" since May 1994. "
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/...ogid=7&cat=320 |
--
well, all i can think of is that since Letterman isnt a persuer, the "judge" ought to agree to the TRO!
i mean, the woman, perhaps unstable, perhaps nutty like a fruit-cake, is trying to protect herself. and since Letterman is already married with children, no one is harmed by the vcomplainer's request for or getting of a TRO!
</smirk>