|
my beloved home of Mahattan, new york
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Dear Scott;
[cut]
So we just file the counterclaim (Libel of Review) and simply continue in competent common law by filing the default judgment at the county clerk and recorder before filing it in the US courthouse.
There is no competence in the US courthouses (except maybe Manhattan Island) so we don't regard the dismissal valid.
|
What you talkin 'bout, Willis-Merrill? 
Why no competence in those named courts,
except maybe on the island?
please expand?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Merrill
However, like I said, once entrenched in administrative process very few employers, bankers and brokers will respect your right to judicial review of the administrative process. Especially when they see you signed and sealed the judgment yourself (albeit out of necessity).
At this point in the reclamation process (of the original estate) I think you need to file in Manhattan at the Court of International Trade. We (about 150 suitors so far) have not tried that yet.
http://www.cit.uscourts.gov
http://www.cit.uscourts.gov/informational/directory.htm
The best thing is if they have made an admission they are moving in admiralty; that they already are entrenched in judicial process. That is Article III jurisdiction and the Verified Statement of Right ( in rem; Rule C) comes into play.
They back off and in the case attached even notify the man by true name so. That is a victory. Unfortunately the wiley agent may pick up administrative process and still convince some sheeple down the road with inferior process to hand over funds. It is sad.
But if you have chosen to fight in Article III, by filing on the Patroonship of Manhattan Island, then please keep us informed.
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ROchapter1.pdf
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ROchapter2.pdf
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ROchapter3.pdf
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. The banker's response attached: Do not bother calling Ted. He never supported the letter by signature. The Libel of Review process convinced the lawyer team retained by 1st Bank. So he sent the letter. The lawyer team actually hired the local IRS agent (who appearantly got fired over the matter) a little later and will no longer honor the judicial process. |
wow, that's impressive.
People are unfortunately and extra-ordinarily un-educated!
thanks, David.
__________________
I claim ownership of and accept responsibility for every word I have written; I cannot claim ownership for any quotes I have made, being the words of whomever I quoted, to whom I say `thank you'.
|