The 39 white dudes who signed the U. S. Constitution never intended for their posterity to become regulated administrative servants, except if they got into commerce. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3, grants to Congress and the States the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several (individual) states. They were never given the right to regulate the common law right to travel and the federal definition of a motor vehicle supersedes any definitions by the states. The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) is defined in its Code (Section 1500) as being within the Business, Transportation and Housing (rented motor homes) Agency.

The pictured Non-commercial International Travel Permit is a common law indicia or (indicator) for which there can be no criminal 'cause of action'; for it is beyond the 'subject matter' jurisdiction or the 'personal jurisdiction' over a natural individual; and is way beyond any state or federal jurisdiction.

In the criminal case of Bell v. Ed Jagels, (Kern County Case # BF 103938) Judge Roger D. Randall ruled that the 'COMMONLAW TRAVEL PERMITs, that were made by Bell, were completely legal and dismissed those charges. This dismissal was also expressed in the Opinion of the Fifth Appellate Court (F045437). Elements of the case, concerning religion, freedom of speech and press, are now petitioned for review by the Supreme Court of California.

The Commonlaw Travel Permit was based on the California First Appellate Court ruling in 'People v. Monroe' (1993), cited at 12 Cal App 4th 1172 which stated: "We conclude that the proper interpretation of the phrase 'satisfactory evidence of identity' requires an officer to accept as presumptively satisfactory any reliable documentary evidence of identity which bears the minimum amount of data required by Vehicle Code licensing and citation statutes. The form of identification must bear a photograph and description of the person, their signature and a current mailing address, and must be serially or otherwise numbered. Such documentary evidence is the functional equivalent of a drivers's license, because it is of equivalent reliability, and because it bears the information necessary for the citation process. When presented with such proof, an officer must accept it as 'satisfactory'."

to see a picture of the permit which you can save and PHOTOSHOP yourself go to www.backlashlaw.com click on "don't drive, travel!" and scroll down

When you prepare your travel permit, do so based on the above ruling. The 'given name', you think is yours is really your parents and according to California Code of Civil Procedure in Section 1279.5 you have the common law right to change your name any time you want to. What you think is your birthday, is really your delivery day; for you were born, and became a natural person, at conception, or 9 months before the delivery (Rowe v. Wade). You can use DOD instead of DOB.

Lucifer can not find you in his computers unless you give him, (1) your statutory, or given, Name, (2) your statutory Date of Birth, DOB, (3) Social Security number (which is optional and not to be used for identification), (4) your state driver's license or ID card number.

Concerning DMV Regulations, Section 12951(a); The only time you have to have a driver's license in your passession is when driving a MOTOR VEHICLE upon a highway. and in Subsection (b) it states: "The DRIVER of a MOTOR VEHICLE shall present his or her license for examination upon demand of a peace officer enforcing this code." Showing your license to strangers, could cause identity theft.

I have made many travel permits for commercial truckers who use them while traveling outside of commerce. The first thing an officer will ask when he arrests (stops) you is "let me see your driver's license." If you give him one, he knows he 'owns' you and that you have voluntarily submitted to the DMV (Demonically Motivated Villains) and its administrative regulations.

One of my clients, using a travel permit, was stopped 5 times by C.H.P., Sheriff and city officers. When they tried to punch him up in their computers, he was a 'no show' so they just told him to leave, knowing they could be sued for false arrest. While at the Narly Nipple - Blossom gold mine in Nevada, I had a run-in with B. L. M. and was arrested. I used my travel permit with a common law name on it. They called most of the federal agencies, trying to find out who I was. I was taken to Las Vegas, finger-printed and booked as a John Doe. The next day, after a time limit, I was released on O. R. and gone. After they got the results of the finger-prints back, they realized they had lost a notorious felon with state and federal warrants for his arrest. The next week the F.B.I. was making raids, trying to find me, but I was back in California with a new name and travel permit. They really do work, if you understand your rights.

The primary reason nobody has to have a driver's license is found on the application form itself, in the Advisory Statement, it informs you that: "this information is public record and is regularly used by law enforcement agencies and insurance companies... and will be available to various authorized requesters (government agents)." If you refuse to give up your right to privacy, there is no way you can obtain a DMV document and that makes the obtaining of a license or ID card voluntary. The older application forms had required (asked) you to have insurance, or proof of responsibility, and a Social Security Number, which is issued under the federal Health and Welfare Code, Title 42. The Certifications on the application form now includes only your agreement to take a blood, breath, or urine test for drugs or alcohol.

You should know that there was no DMV until 1937 and the Driver's License did not exist until the 1964 'change over'. Before 1964 they had the black and white Operator's License with only a thumb print on it. In the "good old days" noncommercial citizens just traveled.

Commercial entities are required to be insured or to bond their motor vehicles. As a Jesusian I can not have any insurance at all; so I created my own bonding company and made the below card.


Defend Yourself and Win Your Case

1. Do not allow an attorney to represent you or take your place. He is a member of the BAR and advocates the overthrow of the Constitution and will not inject your rights nor properly defend you. He is a kissassian owned and controlled by the judge. His job is to get you to plead guilty and take a 'deal' to eliminate court expenses and the cost of a trial. Their objective is to extort money from you to support their scam.

2. Demand that the judge gives you a copy of the Complaint, so you can research the charges. Be sure it is signed by the victim of the crime and not some Assistant D.A. This victim will be your main witness at the trial. PC 988: Cal Con. A1,S15. If you are charged with an infraction the judge will lie to you and say you don't get a Complaint and you must enter a plead based on the Notice to Appear (PC 853.9). However, PC Section 740 clearly states: "all misdemeanors and INFRACTIONS must be prosecuted by written complaint under oath subscribed by the complainant".

3. After you get the Complaint, Demur to the charges under PC 1002 and 1004. Judges and Bargoons will never tell you about this right and it must be done before you enter a plea and a hearing date will be set and the charges may be dropped at this time..

4. In the demur use Sec.1004(5) The offense is justified by the use of Constitutional Rights and the courts lack of jurisdiction over the person. If you are charged with government administrative code violations, such as Health & Safety and the DMV Codes, jurisdiction only applies to those who are currently licensed or perform a function for the state, under the federal commerce clause. Please check out the pretrial motions at the end of "The Bush drug Cartel".

5. If your Demur is not granted, enter a plea of NOT GUILTY and demand a trial by jury. In DMV cases the judge will lie to you and not allow it. You can now file a federal civil action against the judge for the violation of U. S. Constitution, Article 3, Section 3, Which states: "The trial of all crimes... shall be by jury". PC Section 16 also lists Infractions as being crimes and thus affords a trial by jury. If you are denied a jury trial, the judge is admitting that there is no crime, so file or lodge in court a Motion to Dismiss the charges.

6. You may waive time for your trial and if any of your Federal Constitutional Rights have been violated, you may file a collateral Civil action in Federal Court for tort damages. This civil action will be against the police officer, judge and D.A. and his prosecuting attorney. They have no immunity when they violates constitutional rights, USC Title 28, Section 1331 and they are bound to support the U.S. Constitution, Article 6, Section 3.

7. Use the idiot defense, under P.C. Sec. 26: "All persons are capable of committing crimes EXCEPT: 1. children, 2. Idiots, 3. if it was done through ignorance or mistake...". If you; went to public school or registered for the draft or to vote, are politically active or are a 'flag wagger' or filed a tax return, or hate Jesus, you may be an idiot and are qualified to use this defense in court.