|
scott
It appears that you are somewhat confused as to the ramifications of certain procedures and/or proceedings. A dissolution is not what your friend wants, and if he goes down that road he had better make sure that his supply of personal lube is adequate, as the third party interloper (the state) is gonna make sure he gets what he asked for good and hard. Everything he will present will be ignored and they will rule in their own best interests not his.
Divorce is the goal as it is based on common law, and from the info you have provided thus far, only he has cause to sue. But in order to get there all third party contracts and presumptions must be removed i.e. the marriage license and/or application. As long as he allows his marriage to be under the jurisdiction of the state, they will divide his children, property, income as they see fit regardless of any competent witnesses, superior evidence or testimony to the contrary. Dissolution is a rigged game, avoid it at all costs.
While I am 100% in favor of retaining the right to a jury, if it is all merely show than what is the point? If it appears that I am waffling you are correct, in that I don't have all the facts to make an informed conclusion.
But there is one thing I know for certain; I am a sovereign or I am a slave, there is no middle ground. I defend my rights or I succumb to the system, and it is your duty to inform your friend as to his choices.
Now, after reconsidering my reconsideration, it would seem that your friend has more important issues to attend to.
gldskr
|