[fulltitle]

WITHOUT PREJUDICE
The goal was not to sound alarmist, but instead to highlight a 'mentality'. While there might seem to be logic. Consider that there are alternatives to 'marking' someone secretly. If the donor gave blood too frequently might such not manifest in some other manner such as: 1) the donor having blood pressure irregularites, 2) the donor being weak/anemic, 3) the donor looking pale or sickly, 4) the donor manifesting health problems or contraindications associated with being drained of blood on a regular basis, 5) the donar having needle marks/scars/scabs from being poked with a needle on a regular basis? The logic for secretly marking someone is pale and sparse. Its like the situation of shooting a man over suspicion that he has a gun after he obviously has gone through three layers of security that alleged to be manned by professionals. Would not a medical professional be able to spot someone who donates to frequently without utilizing blood donor stain or is does that outside of their skill/training? Let us reason?

As for voting? Totally different matter.