Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lawyerdude
Your harping about positive law exposes you as the uneducated fraud that you are.
Your unsubstantiated slur exposes you as an uneducated boor.
Nobody here will ever find a conflict between the statutes at large and the codes.
Apparently some judges did, you certainly rely a lot on presumption, and that is a pretty broad one at that.
They [sic] statutes at large are merely renumbered and adjusted to be understood with the rest of the code.
First, learn how to proofread before you call someone else uneducated.
Second, that sentence is so poorly constructed and skewed that it makes no sense.
Your harping about them helps nobody with their legal problems.
Your harping helps nobody, period.
It is a distraction.
To whom? To you? What do you care?
It is the fodder of the patriot nutjob community.
The "It" that you are referring to was never clearly delineated or defined when it was introduced, so what exactly is "It?"
That community patronizes this forum.
Are you not now patronizing?
|
What do those cases Mr. Weisshaupt cited address when they refer to differences between statutes at large and U.S.C.?
Have you read any of them?
Were those quotes from decisions or opinions in those case citations?
If so, why did whatever judge was being quoted write those particular words?
If there are no instances where a Statute at Large and "Code" are at variance, then why have judges written the words I just read?
Did the gentleman who posted them make it all up?
Why is there unannoted "U.S." "code," and annotated "U.S." "code," and why is annotated "U.S." "code," seemingly seldom referenced?
If you have a grudge to settle here, so be it, but I have no idea what else you might constructively be doing here since you have contributed nothing but unabated rancor punctuated with crude expletives.
Are you suggesting the "nutjobs" fold their tents and silently steal away or what?
Are you proposing to "save" the nutjobs from their own folly, or just spewing hyperbolic fluff.
Or are you just another J.A.M.F. in need of a proctocological procedure to remove his head from the place where the sun does not shine.
Perhaps you might just go forth and multiply thyself.