Yup, Nevada says the samething. I discoverd the trick with the "commercial" last year. Good to know its the same in Georgia too!
Check this out----
These two below federal definitions negate and void all definitions of MOTOR VEHICLE as found in the California Motor Vehicle Code; for it states in Section 15210(i)(7): "IN THE ABSENCE OF A FEDERAL DEFINITION, existing definitions under this code shall apply
Title 18, Section 31(a)(6) it states: "The term motor vehicle means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo".
Section 31(a)(10) states: "The term 'used for commercial purpose' means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit".
I also have received a copy of the stat 32 page 624 par 11 of 57th congress 1st session of 1902 talks about an ACT regarding "passenger vehicles for hire shall pay a license tax."
Par 13 talks about vehicles for higher or stored for other for capital gain must also pay a license tax.
Then in the 62nd congress January 1913 stat 37 page 654 clearly says "All passenger vehicles for hire..." "shall carry... a number corresponding with the number on the license issued to the driver or operator..."
These are tiff files and I tried to make them an attachment so you can see these, but it wont take a tiff file.
If anyone can do something to get these postes here let me know.
|