View Single Post
  #9  
Old 03-16-2006, 01:22 AM
rottweiler's Avatar
rottweiler rottweiler is online now
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: judicial district of tens: Milwaukee the county: Wisconsin the land
Posts: 2,597
Ok, I am just trying to help. I thought the notary and the UCC were public and you are trying to make them rebut your affidavit that you are private. I was afraid you may have rebutted it yourself by claiming rights under the UCC and having a actor "ID" you. I personally would use two witnesses and "all rights reserved" by my signature. What you are doing is a private common law contract so I just thought the best way was to keep it all in common law. There have been many wins doing it like I said only not by me. I own/operate a limo service so I have plates, insurance, etc. Friday I go to traffic court after filing TicketSlayer docs for a dog at large citation(no lease) and I will let you know how it turns out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KITCHIE
This my affidavit that I will file with the court along with the administrative business of the court. That business is that they can't have a trial until I have finished the administrative process.

I attached my admin remedy on the thread 7 tickets.

Rottweiler--- absolutely NOT. A Notary IS two witnesses and they are officers of the court who will testify on your behalf that you signed the doc titled Affidavit or whatever.

They have accused me of being in commerce. I noticed them I was not in commerce I was taking care of my private business and I didn't need license and registration for that. The court recognizes the exact way the affidavit is written and there is no wiggle room for them. They chose to step outside the law and cite me "In my opinion" as the sheriff remarked to me. Well since when do you enforce your opinion? Now...THEY WILL PAY.

I keep telling everybody when you fight them, you have to tell them your not in commerce. They presume you are in commerce and the law states you have to prove you are not.

The key with the courts is they ALWAYS recast you as Pro per and that puts you under their corporate jurisdiction and you lose. NEVER let them "re-cast" your status i.e. properia personnae and sui juris!! And if they enter a judgment against you you are all set for a void judgment.

Kitchie



Have you won stuff doing the "signature" the way you suggested?
Reply With Quote