Skeptic,
Besides being an idiot, your knowledge of the commercial lien process is simply underwhelming! You would have to commit a common law or contractual tort against Satori in order for him to initiate the process, ergo, he cant go after OJ! Secondly, treason isnt a tort against an individual, the power to deal with that crime is given to the federal goverment.
Libel is something that can be dealt with using said process should Satori decide that he indeed, has sufficient grounds to pursue this. You would be served the initial affidavit of fact stating point by point your transgressions and given 20-30 days to rebut. Should you respond to his alllegations point for point, Satori would be forced to drop the matter OR approach the sheriff and charge him to act in his/her common law capacity and convene a common law jury to decide the matter. Otherwise if you fail to respond, a notice of default/ opportunity to cure would be served upon you and you might be given 10 days to rectify the matter. Further lack of response would result in a criminal complaint with a list of damages and monetary amounts as given in Title 18 being appended to the paperwork and filed with the state AG's office (They DO have the option of initiating a grand jury investigation). At this point the lien is perfected and the lienor would either file a UCC-1 against any assets/property you might own or if you happen to be a public official, it is advisable that he first take his perfected lien (admin judgment) to the US Court of Claims for judicial review THEN file the UCC-1. That avoids any statutory problems for liening state officials without a judgment from a court!
After all that, the lien is a marketable security and it can be sold as a receivable to a debt collector who will make yer life miserable OR he can try to push for an involuntary BK.
Skeptic, I would suggest that you look at the commercial lien doc in the download section of the site, it outlines the process quite well. The only question I have concerning all of this is one of jurisdiction, this little "test" you suggest is taking place in cyberspace. The question of which "meat address" would be deemed to have jurisdiction needs to be answered, since in the process, all these docs are not only served upon you, they are filed with the county recorder to create a record to fulfill common law requirements. This process isnt lawless, the same principles are used by debt collectors of all kinds. This process is also a two edged sword, perjury on the part of the affiant exposes him/her to the same penalties that they are trying to impose on the transgressor. So its not something you initiate lightly, especially against the likes of a mentally deficient Quatloosian tard. It's far easier for him to take the advice you give in your signature line......ignore me!