|
Agreed.
That is the assurance/insurance system behind the Torrens System of law. The baseline conviction of the current status quo is that you and I are mere tenants. Refering to the attached Word file, the husband/man was already presumed a tenant. The question the chief judge brought up was induced by the man processing a Libel of Review in only his name. So the USA went after the wife and the chief judge wanted a hearing about the presumption the wife was a tenant. The USA needed a tenant, not a landowner. If the USA could get the woman named as a co-tenant then that would reinstall the man as the tenant, even after the LoR had proven otherwise. The trick was not to acquiesce to the woman/wife being a co-tenant.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|