Quote:
this web link to the awesome letter misapplication of title 26: http://www.gamblin.net/webbackups/no...ticeOfLEVY.pdf . the author links current tilte 26 sections back to the original statutes at large which shows the original taxable activity intent of the statute. "thereby refuting and rebutting the section for collection of income taxes and therefor legal presumption of evidence of law is removed.."
does anyone know of a source(s) that go into this depth?
|
This is one of the most imaginative pieces of fantasy I have ever read. It cites title 27 part 70, which deals with the prohibition amendment which has mostly been repealed, as its source of the alleged "mistake". The notices, demands, and referrals to congresmen are meaningless. Refuting and rebutting a collection action in this form has no effect, as no valid cite of any case law or other statute or reg was cited. This is simply saying there is no law because I refute and rebute it.
This would never stop a collection proceeding and might get you referred to a treasury agent for a review as a tax protestor or get sent to criminal investigations for review. Not a good result. Anybody that gets to a point of getting these kind of letters has missed the point anyway.
When what isn't becomes more important than what is, everything comes to a stop.