[Ice]

logos,



The account number belongs to the bank. When we close an account we give up the right to use the number as well as all access to the account. Using an account number that no longer belongs to you is a Trespass upon the property of another. How is this NOT wrong? Also note that the "routing" number is provided to the bank by the Fed. Res. Hence, another Trespass.



HJR 192 mentions the types of instruments that are allowed by law to discharge debt. A CPN is/are not funds "drawn from an account" of any kind. But the CPN is a valid instrument to discharge debt.



This is very simple logic. You can attempt to "prove" the "secret" accounts the gov. is supposed to have for each of us but you could never convince me that you have any rights to an account number that you have relinquished all rights to. In regards to these other types of accounts that are supposed to be out there -- I have not seen nor have I been presented with any proof that they exist. <u>Until the proof is plain</u> there ain't no such thing.



Ice