I have seen this bandied about on the forum, this reference to ‘special law’. Does anyone have a clue what it is? As no one takes the time to explain the intricacies of just what this special law is - the how, where, what, why and when, has not the law [whatever it is perceived to be] just not required an impossibility and is, void for vagueness because ‘men of common intelligence’ have to guess at its meaning?

Point, 43 - Response from the United States Treasury, Disclosure Officer Cynthia J. Mills that reads: “The internal Revenue Code is not positive law, it is SPECIAL LAW. It applies to specific persons in the United States who CHOOSE to make themselves subject to the requirements of the SPECIAL LAWS in the Internal Revenue Code by entering into an employment agreement with the U.S. Government.” (See exhibit “H”)

"A statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application, violates the first essential of due process of law." Connally et al. v. General Construction Co. 269 U.S 385, 391 (1926). See also Cruikshank supra. U.S. v. De Cadena, 105 F.Supp. 202, 204 (1952), Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U.S. 451 (1939), e Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91(1945), Williams v. United States, 341 U.S. 97, and Jordan v. De George, 341 U.S. 223 (1951).