Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mutt
It depends primarily on the body of law of your state. Some states hold that the non-paternal father, even though not having adopted the child, is the pschological father of the child for child support purposes.
I would suggest that since the child has his name, and was born of the marriage that he would have a shot at custody. However, there is also a body of law in some states that the child is best left with the mother during its formative years. That being the case, there must be cause for custody to be given to the father.
Most states have a shared custody arrangement, with one being designated as the primary custodial parent.
I hope this helps somewhat.
Mutt
|
If he could get custody then he would want to go for that but he doesn't know how much of a shot he'll get in Texas. TX like you said, primarily will side the mother more than the father...but if he's not able to get full custody he at least wants half or have visitation rights. She doesn't want him to see the kid and has already filed for no contact order. They're already divorce but nothing on paper about the kid...