View Single Post
  #10  
Old 05-03-2006, 08:58 AM
scooterdog scooterdog is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 188
I dont' care what state your in, it would be for the "best interest of the child". I would think the man would have a constitutional right to shared custody. If she is trying to deny visitation, well, she may not be seeing this child for very long.

Is he a bad father?? I don't see what she's trying to do here. In my situation, the mother, more here lawyer "hinted" that I might not be the father. That blew up in thier face. Doens't matter, what matters is the best interest of the child. I now have "FULL CUSTODY AND CONTROL", the state doens't even question me, and can't.

A "third party" can have visitation, as long as its in the childs best interest. Maybe I shouldn't say this, but... Sounds to me like "mommy" thinks she owns this child, and I hate to be the one to burst a bubble here, it just doesn't work that way.

If this guy is good to the child, there shouldn't be a problem. Mothers pull this crap all the time, some have good reason too, others simply because there ins't alot of help for men in these situations. Of course, I'm sure now that she wants out, the usuall "he beat me, he touched the child wrong, he's dangerous, ect.." will come out. Custody can and will change hands if a mother denies visitation, its just that simple.
Reply With Quote