Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ice
The cost is isn't the issue.
The issue is having a true and very accurate transcript.
One of the most frequent court exercises is the alteration of the transcript.
You will find other threads within the forum that deal with this issue.
Check some of the older threads.
Ice
|
Of course I understand cost is not the issue.
I full well know that courts alter transcripts, among other nefarious habitual deceits.
I full well understand the importance of having a verbatim transcript of every word.
I do not understand the nature of your reply.
I am connected with with people who are addressing the issue of the altering of transcripts, as well as other issues of corruption.
I personally know of a particularly egegious case involving a pro se litigant succesfully suing the City of Chhicago (pro se, after having to fire at least two "lawyers"), which was overturned on appeal based on altered transcripts.
I just was curious to know how much one's own court reporter is likely to cost, and how that cost compares to somebody paying for a transcript that might be subject to alteration.
Was that unclear?