Quote:
Don't worry. They'll ignore it (because it means nothing in the legal sense).
When you don't appear as the summons directed, the court will issue a warrant for failure to appear.
You have nothing to worry about until you get pulled over again or go to get insurance, renew your driver's license or register a vehicle. Then things start to get interesting.
Life is oh so much more interesting when you try to BS the system. In medicine, they call it quackery. At least with the silliness some people recommend no one usually dies, they just get incarcerated or have to pay thre or four times what the original ticket penalty was or could have been.
|
Brother Roy! You having a bad day or somthing?
Have you not considered that the Competing court where the drifting peice of scrip/contract "tickette to the freak show" was completed and signed and indorsed; administratively settled the dispute in terms of interests, authentic? I, the Count, don't move about the Orange or her countee, and collect debt from any source that I wasn't assigned and appointed to collect on someone else's behalf. As well, moving contracts around and threatening people for not pledging counterfeit name as collateral, is estoppel in the nature of preventing the damages or sale being reimbursed with lawful money.
If the people weren't forced to pledge their flesh and name for trade as collateral in the event, then you would see more case-law of State of **** vs One Smelly Hippy Wagon. As far as we are all concerned with the nature of such presentments made at strange and uncomfortable moments, an agent of a corporation presented an incomplete instrument to a senile motorist in hope that he would presume to invest some stock/collateral/debt with the speculation that a corporation may evaluate that collateral as to draw/activate a prior agreement conferring admittance to administer the property in dispute (to the usuall agreeable protest of any captors). To comprehend is Negotiable Instruments law; that an instrument not signed is open for correction and completion. I'll quote from a reference I keep under the fighting chair of this here aquatic drag-trike that I use onshore for movement and recumbenantly into the sea to collect my modified-Grocery-store shopping-cart lobster pots.
"Although an instrument is nonnegotiable if it states that it is subject to or governed by any other agreement, it may refer to the transaction or agreement out of which it arises. (
See Allentberg v. Rapken & Co. (1930)"
That little peice of paper needs to have some covering striked through to reveal it a proper negotion and not just intellectual property from a foreign entity to draw from its necessity to use it. (standing timber contracts reveal that even the origin of paper on wich a contract is derived can be used to draw royalties from an event.)
"A negotiable instrument must contain an unconditional promise or order to pay. (
Unif.Com.C. 3-103(1)(b).)"
The peice of paper is typed for another party to "agree to appear" without purpose; evidence of counterfeit form and irrelevant for the original dispute at hand, regardless of one's attendance at the theatre or not -- the seat is reserved and will be sold to someone if vacant at time of the doors closed at that wooden bar (not Bar or BAR). And the legislated actor, if he too doesn't appear, then they'll arrest him for violating a prior contract too. That foreign Judicial Department is silenty admitting another purpose by the mere introduction of such a form that they claim on the border fringe of the paper; membership clause to the institution that appointed that foreign Judicial Department would have disclosed whether or not the assignments were compulsory activities determined by its trusted officers at any time or activated by their inclusion of interests in a suit. Here we see de-jure Count-less tresspass, without Declaration, in attempt to seize as collateral both the people and the Lord's vessel given them.
SALES PERFORMANCE
A. In General.
1. Identification of Goods to Contract
Identification is the act of designating particular goods as the subject matter of the contract. Identification is ordinarily unambiguous and doubts should be resolved by concluding that identification has ocurred. (
See U.C.C 2501, Official Comment 2; see generaly 1 C.E.B., Commercial Law clause 13.2 et seq.; 3 Anderson 3d, clause 2-501:5.) Goods may be identified "at any time and in any manner explicitly agreed to by the parties." (
U.C.C. 2501(1); and see Official Comment 3.) In the absence of an explicit agreement, identification occurs as follows:
(a) Goods "already existing and identified" are identified when contract is made. (
U.C.C. 2501(1)(a).)
(b) Future goods other than unborn young or future crops are identified when the seller ships, marks or otherwise designates goods as those to which the contract refers. (
U.C.C. 2501(1)(b); see 3 Anderson 3d, clauses 2-501:21, 2-501:22.)
Yet again, the "tickette" presumes that the property in dispute is for Sale.
Today, someone is trying to diminish His love:
without prejudice, Gregory Thomas(tm)