Quote:
|
Originally Posted by weishaupt1776
Jersee, so if an agency comes after a foreign diplomat and he wishes to sue them at the Federal Court of Claims; - can he just claim "I'm a diplomat" in a brief and they'll believe him
OR - does he have to provide evidence of such as an exhibit in order to demonstrate his diplomatic status?
|
Hey Weis!
Good question, although loaded.
To answer I will have to assume the accused is arguing. If this is the case--he will lose. however, if he is accused of something--the question can always be asked to prove jurisdiction. Further he can state who he is, the last bit of info that I have come to know is that it is their burden to prove that the accused is not sovereign. if they can dispell universal truths about man, government, and the Almighty--then I'd say he's going down.
Moreover, i cannot assume that one side will believe the other based on a brief. But I can say that one side will have no choice but to believe the other if their affidavit cannot be rebutted or proven wrong. But you and i know that folks get railroaded daily.
This does not extinguish the fact that sovereignty rests with us and they cannot prove that it does not--nor will they ever. You and I both know that they will not come out and say that government is superior and has jurisdiction over mankind. It will say that it has jurisdiction over its "CITIZENS" which whom they created. This goes back to my statement, "the created cannot be greater than the creator".
Now if you were looking for a "yes" or "no" answer without an explanation, my bad--but that is exactly how they railroad folks. For example, "Have you stopped beating your wife, yes or no?"
Good post, let's keep it going Weis.