View Single Post
  #6  
Old 05-22-2006, 04:47 PM
mnchicago mnchicago is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 388
What AndyK And Shoonra Are Defending

Both take pride in pointing out the legitimacy of
Congress and the IMF’s collection arm, the IRS. Here is
the kind of “integrity” Andy and Shoonra stand for:

I have stated that both deal with symptoms, not
substance; with smoke and mirrors of
prima facie “evidence,” passing it off as lawful, as
their patriotic(?) duty requires, self-imposed or
otherwise.

How either can defend Congressional deception via the
creation of a legislative democracy within our
Constitutional Republic is beyond the pale.

Under the Constitution, Congress has limited powers as
so enumerated. Under the federal Government, Congress
has unlimited, plenary power to do whatever it wants.
However, that power pertains only to the federal “United
States,” consisting of the District of Columbia,
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and
Samoa.

Through deception and manipulation, Congress, itself
deceived and manipulated by the international bankers
that now own us, has gutted sovereign rights and the
Common Law into Public Policy and statutory
strangulation. Further, we all know that Congress has
obligated all the States of the Union into an unholy
commercial pact with the federal “United States,” via
federal programs and the UCC.

The term “State” in the IRC means the District of
Columbia, and all of its territories. The IRS and the
courts would have us all believe that when we read the
word “State” in the code that it means one of the
States of the Union.

Not so.

7701(a)(4) State – the word “State” means five federal
States belonging to the “United
States.”

When states of the Union, counties, municipalities, etc,
require us to provide a SSN to obtain a driver’s license,
for example, they use as an authority:

42 USC 405 (2)(c)(i) “It is the policy (not law) of
the “United States” that any “State” may, in the
administration of any tax…..”

Any State?

Read a little further:

42 USC 405 (2)(c)(vi) defines “State” as “for
purposes of clause (i) of this subparagraph, the
term “state” includes (in the restrictive form) the
District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, Commonwealth of
Northern Marianas, and the Trust Territory of the
Pacific Islands.

The entire IRC has been written for the “United States,”
as described above, but everyone else is led to believe
it applies to the States of the Union. Deception and
fraud on the largest scale imaginable.

28 USC 1603(a)(3) – which is neither a citizen of a
State of the “United States” as defined in section
1332(c) and (d) of this title.

Section 1332(d) – the word “States,” as used with
this section, includes the Territories, the District of
Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

26 USC 7701 (a)(9) – United States. The term “United
States” when used in a geographical sense includes
only the “States” and the District of Columbia.

When Congress wants to include the 50 States of the Union, they specifically do:

26 USC 4612 (a)(4)(A) In general, the term “United
States” means the 50 States, the District of
Columbia, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any
possessions of the “United States,” the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,
and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
Reply With Quote