conversation with a lawyer
the other day i had an interesting conversation with an attorney-at-law.
i simply asked him if he was familar with the "sovereignty movement"
he said "yes".
I said so is the sovereignty movement pretty common in the legal system or they considered the "fringe"
he said the "fringe"
i said so have you ever heard of any strategies called "acceptance for value or refusal for cause"
he replied "yes i have heard of these tactics, but you must be very, very careful as it can get you into trouble.
i said what do you mean?
he goes , well if you piss the judge off to much by "asking questions" you can only take it so far...
i said "contempt"
the attorney goes, well not neccessarily , but it has happened before.
I said so wouldnt the judge/prosector be kind of pissed off if he has to discharge your case and they dont get any money from say a traffic citation in an adminstrative hearing.
he looked at me kind of irritated , shakes his head, and goes , yes possibly.....
then it was his stop to get off the subway, he looks at me kind of pissed of and goes nice chatting with you.
i go the same..
Comments???
|