I used to take the same approach by citing code sections, requesting their authority & delegation of it, FOIA requests, decoding my master file,etc..... Until I discovered that my name in all CAPITAL LETTERS is a constructive trust title.
Any stipulation they may send & you respond to it with what you think, you are admitting that you are JOHN DOE while you are really John Doe, the flesh and blood human. So no matter how right you may be in your response, you have agreed to be roped into their venue.
The word "United States" is defined as the District of Colombia in 26USC7701. The following words "person"; "citizen";"individual" all refer to federally chartered corporate trusts. (go to famguardian.org link to taxfreedom-forms & instructions-cites by topic-SCROLL to U.S citizen & U.S. person to really understand this.
There are ONLY 2 ways you can respond :Honor or Dishonor
Within Honor you fully accept or conditionally accept
Within Dishonor you argue(citing code sections, etc...) or remain silent
By honoring their contract, you are now in control of it & prevent any re-negotiation on their end.
Study how to draft conditional acceptances with an affidavit in support
and keep them at bay.
I Have repented of the Irwin Schiff arguing method & am now studying the redemption process set up by the Lord Jesus Christ. One of His vessels is a man named Rice McCleod(
www.beam.to/redemption), a woman named Victoria Joy(angelwiththeinkwell.org) & Jack Smith of Right Way Law.