|
The problem is that the credit/debt collector "industry" has had well over 100 years to set case precedent regarding the assignment of third party debt collectors and the courts and judges are more than willing to allow the debt attorneys to come forward as the true holder of the debt. As the black robed meatball sub blurted out in court concerning my "debt" on this very issue, "Yes that is true, they(debt attorneys) buy these debts for pennies on the dollar, its called capitalism, welcome to amerika". So precedent is set. And the judge will uphold that finding, unless you are able to derail the attack via some other angle as this angle has long ago been determined. The judge is not going to rule against the banking industry that is for sure. So you have to find another path of attack.
Heck the case cite they use in Michigan MCR 6145 goes back to some case precedent that was set back in 1924 concerning a debt. So wolpoff wins another one, the creeps......
|