SJ..
Thanks for responding....
It's quite the convoluted mess, aint it?
Quote:
|
Yes, they are attorneys. But, are they "representing a foreign government in legal matters" while acting as judge?
|
The quoted USSC case RABINOWITZ v. KENNEDY, 376 U.S. 605 was about representing Cuba during the cold war, and therefore the specific reference to foreign governments. But the code is very specific.
Quote:
22 U.S. C. 611(b)(d)(1) any person who acts as an agent, representative, employee, or servant, or any person who acts in any other capacity at the order, request, or under the direction or control, of a foreign principal or of a person any of whose activities are directly or indirectly supervised, directed, controlled, financed, orsubsidized in whole or in major part by a foreign principal, and who directly or through any other person-
(i) engages within the United States in political activities for or in the interests of such foreign principal;
(ii) acts within the United States as a public relations counsel, publicity agent, information-service employee or political consultant for or in the interests of such foreign principal;
(iii) within the United States solicits, collects, disburses, ordispenses contributions, loans, money, or other things of value for or in the interest of such foreign principal; or
(iv) within the United States represents the interests of such foreign principal before any agency or officials of the Government of theUnited States
|
Simply stated, is the Judge "representing a foreign government in legal matters"?? Not as an attorney... no.. He is representing the Judicial branch of U.S. corp., (at least, until, the Fed comes out of the closet, and admits they're ALL agents servicing the bankruptsy, or we can prove it is so, per your comment).
What we CAN show is that the judge
is working for members of the judicial branch who are, per the code, foreign agents... therefore, per the code, the judge is one also.
To be honest, I am unsure of the relative positioning of the "top dogs" in the judicial branch, and need to undertand exactly how the power flows in order to make this arguement stick... However, I am certain of this much....
The cops today are all automatrons. They aren't allowed the discretion to do what they thought was appropriate, like they were able to, say... 40 years ago.
Today, if there is ANY grey area in a cops situation, they immediately get on the phone to the DA ( read: prosecuting ATTORNEY for that federal district), so they can get legal advise from their Master's agent on how they should handle the situation. If the case involves a murder, for instance, then the STATE Attorney General takes over (being the local DA's BOSS).
Further still, if the murder(s) involve multiple states, then the case gets turned over to the Attorney General of the United States (the State AG's BOSS), does it not? and isn't HE a foreign principal per the code?
Doesn't this mean, the USAG, the State AG, the local DA, and ALL police officers are foreign agents?
Another angle.....
This is all about a "foreign principal" (government or corporation) outside the UNITED STATES
INC.
As you know,
all the states were
conquered and forced to rewrite their constitutions, by the federal government, in the 1860's and early 70's, but they
didn't have to tell anyone they were conquered ( more non-dosclosure / collusion)
per Article I of the Leiber Code (General Order 100). Therefore, the states themselves, are no longer separate entities, are they?
Quote:
|
Lieber Code, Article I, "a place, district or country occupied by a country stands, in consequence of the occupation, under the martial law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring martial law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not. Martial law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest."
|
What this does mean, is that, as a sovereign, in
their state or federal court,
I am a foreign government, so they would need a foreign agent registration form to represent ME !
So.. what do you think?
Brainstorm with me plz... SJ, et al...
kgod, you were going to research this... what conclusions did you come too?
We must critically scrutinize each others perspective That is what makes a Master Mind Group (created by this forum, and like ALL corporations have) so powerful ! If we aren't comfortable with defending our perspective, the DA will cut us to ribbons in court ! It's called constructive criticism !! lol
So.. Fire away !!! lol
For HIS Glory,
Akira