Thread: Oath Purgatory
View Single Post
  #3  
Old 06-25-2006, 09:25 AM
aksis's Avatar
aksis aksis is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Universal Kingdom of God; Earth
Posts: 1,051
About evidence & rebuttable presumptions
Let's look at 8 USC 1502:
Sec. 1502. Certificate of nationality issued by Secretary of State for person not a naturalized citizen of United States for use in proceedings of a foreign state

-STATUTE-
The Secretary of State is authorized to issue, in his discretion and in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by him, a certificate of nationality for any person not a naturalized citizen of the United States who presents satisfactory evidence that he is an American national and that such certificate is needed for use in judicial or administrative proceedings in a foreign state.
Now notice that ONE MUST PROVIDE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE.

What better evidence could we provide in our next proceeding than the hefty admin record IN LAW that we are a state national?

The term American National is only a general designation. More specifically, all your American nationalities are PROVEN to exist Here in the U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual at 5.22 & 5.23 says:
5.22. The table beginning on page 233 shows forms to be used for nouns and adjectives denoting nationality.

5.23. In designating the natives of the several States, the following forms will be used.
Alabamian
Alaskan
Arizonan
Arkansan
Californian
Coloradan
Connecticuter
Delawarean
Floridian
, etc . .
One is a Michiginian or New Jersian, etc . . .

More on 8 USC 1502 continued:
Such certificate shall be solely for use in the case for which it was issued and shall be transmitted by the Secretary of State through appropriate official channels to the judicial or administrative officers of the foreign state in which it is to be used.
So at the next proceeding, this court cannot even move forward until I get my certificate in 8 USC 1502. I have provided satisfactory evidence that I am not a naturalized U.S. citizen WAY BEFORE THIS CHARADE.

Satisfactory evidence IS NOT waiting for them to pounce on you & then stating how sovereign you are in your pleading and that you are a lumberjack on the land who gets his maple syrup on tap from the trees he chops and mainlines it in his nutsack, etc . . .

[NOTE: THIS IS NOT MY WORK, I must give credit where credit is due: This was transcribed from http://sovereignpeoplescourt.net/page3.html ]
__________________
Note: It is a custom recognized by many People to use a ":" (colon) between one's name and their FAMILY name, and is used to segregate the name pertaining to the natural sovereign man, "Christopher Theodore," from the FAMILY name, "RHODES" (an implied trust), and further, both from the name of the resulting constructive trust, "CHRISTOPHER THEODORE RHODES".
Reply With Quote