View Single Post
  #5  
Old 06-27-2006, 07:55 PM
HenryBowman
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by B Rookard
How many times do I have to say it ... a resulting trust, or constructive trust ... IS NOT A TRUST.

It is a misnomer to actually call it a "trust."

As I said though, it is not a trust, it's just the idea behind it is *kind of* like a trust, so that's what they call it ... it IS NOT, IS NOT, IS NOT a trust.

ROFLMAO!!!!!

You sure are working hard to convince us of that. Good thing I don't believe you. I'd believe Bouvier over you any day. I'd even believe Black's over you.

When they get a load of my actions resulting from the written Agreement, they will probably be screaming the same thing you are screaming, but at that point, it won't much matter. Their actions will have sealed their fate.

I heard someone I explained this to today say this is more powerful (but along the same lines) as the Waiver of Tort.

I needed that laugh you provided. As I said in my first post in this thread, this is the most powerful information I have ever come across.

Just posting it made you squeal like a pig. And I didn't even tell you what I was going to do with the information.

Thanks again,
Reply With Quote