View Single Post
  #46  
Old 06-28-2006, 04:58 PM
cowboytroll's Avatar
cowboytroll cowboytroll is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 18
No disrespect but you are wrong the II Am.Jur. (1st) Constitutional Law, Sect.329, p.1135 Has decided otherwise!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Personal liberty largely consists of the Right of locomotion -- to go where and when one pleases -- only so far restrained as the Rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, (This means that the state can notprohibit movement)[/b] but the common Right which he has under his Right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this Constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's Rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct."

All laws must be broken down to their most basic form so saying that heere goes:
"Personal liberty largely consists of the Right of locomotion to go where and when one pleases, not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will(ie DLs)but the common Right which he has under his Right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's Rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct."

Also in another discussion about probable cause. There can be no arresrt or detention w/o a grand jury summons. No unelected person has any power to stop you. Just because it happens does not mean it is legal. Color of law is used all to often, make the prosacuting attorny or DA prove the court has jurisdiction. Akira has an exelant form outlining the 7 elements to juriisdiction. No state or federal agency has the right or athority to bring suit on a sovergn citizen. If a state or federal agency tries to bring suit aginst you ask for proof of jurisdiction first off, then ask the agency to produce an injured party by cause of your actions. I made the mistake of making a motion insted of demanding them to prove jurisdiction. If No injured party is produced, and jurisdiction is not proven then they have no case. And remember the officer issuing the summons(ticket)cannot testify aginst you. They served the summons therefore according to the CRSF no perason serving a summons can testify aginst the summoned.
Reply With Quote