[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by scottinalaska

Perhaps then, in our court papers that are filed, instead of identifying one's self as:
Scottinalaska, pro se
it should more properly read:
Scottinalaska, suijuris

Yes, dear Sovereign, Solar Citizen.
Yes, indeed.


I like that. I guess the "pro se" part just helped stroke the ego when I am going against folks who can put "esq" after their names or "State of" before their names!

s

So true, as these folks are trained in Latin heavily.

Their mind is, also, subjected to vigorous schooling in their Universities.

Upon reading a mere "Pro Se" their mind, translates that term into the symbolism i.e. what it implies.

It implies a fiction that we are not existent and we are so poor and incompetent that can not afford their (attorneys') service.

Judges' mind would translate a bit deeper.

"Oh, Lord, now I have to deal with wild, unorganized, illiterate in law creature. who would only waste my time.
She/she has no clue of the Court procedure and law, I have neither time nor desire to give him/her a legal advice as well as that is illegal!"

I guarantee you that the majority of "their honors" feel that way,

while when it comes to giving/writing instruction to the Juries when such are have to be used in Court, the same Judges can, suddenly, explain everything and write instruction in simple, English terms.

Symbolism attached to "Pro Se" is devastating.

It is very close as to appear before these "honors" with a big label - "FOOL."

That is how most of them look at us.

They are indoctrinated into the idea that appearing without an attorney is an act of stupidity on our part.

They may not give us a legal advice, OK, but how often, we have to hear their, "Sir/Madam you should hire services of a council."

Is that not a legal advice and shoved down our throat?