[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by pocatello

What a load of nonsense. I finished with the thread when Heidi whined about people abusing her while calling me a "dumbass" and accusing me of being someone else. I don't stoop to her level.

Good day or night or in-between, whenever your would read the post.

What a load of nonsense.

Are you sure?
You keep failing rules of logic here, which is your choice of course.
You present your opinion as a fact or verity or even a Maxim.

"Nonsense" to you is not nonsense to others, at least to the decent ones re: violations vs. Sui Juries.

This is a fact and not an opinion.

I finished with the thread when Heidi whined about people abusing her while calling me a "dumbass" and accusing me of being someone else.

Again and again, you attempt to falsify facts and events on record.
A reader who assumes your statements to be true, would believe the above.
Yet, you use deceit again as facts prove that not, only, Heidi but, also, I responded to you and in details.

I state so and the Posts prove so, as none of you can edit them here.

In my opinion, based on record, visible to all, you could not respond to that intelligently or even non-intelligently overall and, basically, defaulted.

Another word, you manipulated facts and substituted them with your version of events in this reply of yours.

Truth is whole, nevertheless.
How consistent of you.

As for for anyone calling you derogatory names, I must agree with you that you, finally, raised a valid argument.

As fairness means being extended to all sides equally, what I advocate consistently, the same rules should apply to all.

SL: No one should call any one rude names.

I adhered to that rule and would continue doing so, as, only, address the issues by substance, even though may use metaphors and symbolism.

I don't stoop to her level

Please re-read your, previous posts in that regard and re-evaluate, if care.

The main issue remains that numbers of members from Sui Juries were treated criminally by the parties in discussion who have been stealing their, intellectual property (their writings), altering it without their approval in a hostile and detrimental to them format and, then posed that as it fitted the agenda of the "accusers."

Since you referred to that as people

"whined",

many of us would like to see how would you respond were you treated that, despicable way?

Note

that you are allowed to post here freely and no editing is done behind your back.

Sui Juries act Sui Juries and not quatloos.

Some Sui Juries were robed of that intrinsic right (to post free of unauthorized editing) at that Website.

Now, imagine your posts were edited without your permission.
How non-whining you would have been, then, is a state of fiction in my strong opinion.

Proof:

No one altered your writings here, and, yet, you can't relax your nervous-muscular system even though defaulting on the arguments I raised previously.


We can imagine if.......