I would reply by precise details by tomorrow
and some may see that what has been written in dispute is pre-mature and not inaccurate at all.
I stand by the substance shared fully.
Also, don't forget: we live in the physical Universe and not only, among, prevailing religious concepts.
Only both provide a complete sphere and not two, separated hemi-spheres.
Quote:
|
Spiritual and physical are indispensable in terms of humans.
|
Meanwhile a question to you all:
have you read anything of Aivanhov or you state without understanding what he wrote?
If you did: what specifically?
If you didn't: do you reply by comprehending what he meant or by your assumptions?
Which is of more value?
General cliché phrase have nothing to do with specific references.
I can put a phrase "God is Almighty" or "Universe is Almighty!"
Yes, so what?
What about the people who choose not to believe in the prevailing religious dogmas and refer to the physical concepts of the Universe and how those affect the humans?
Are they, all, wrong?
Is science to be abolished, then?
Quote:
|
if your masters will let you answer that
|
What?
I am my own man, even if your masters let you phrase your questions this way.
If you may claim, speaking in the name of God...
Well, why jump the gun?
I would rather read your reply.
Plus, only Inquisition
forces to "confess."
That reminds me of something.
Please reread your question aloud few times...
Just few questions.