Quote:
|
Originally Posted by citizensoldier
An easement does not grant any interest in the land - it only provides evidence of a contractual agreement between the landowner(s) and whomever requests a right-of-way.
Just because you work in an industry that repeatedly violates property rights under color of law and get away with it due to ignorance of the land owners doesn't show you are right.
Jdogpupil:
Your intentions as described in this thread show you to be a disreputable sort who seeks to steal land from its rightful owners.
Follow what honorable, moral, law-abiding people do - save up the money to buy property.
|
First land belongs to those on it. It is the propper position of the land to be possesed by those living on it.
Second, prescriptive easements are not contractual. A contract would actually prevent this type of easement.
Third, My "industry" of land surveying does nothing. We simply describe the land for someone and prepare a description of the property for them in an exhibit. Property owners are the ones that "steal" from eachother, not the land surveyors.
Fourth, not all prescriptive easements are for Right of ways.
Fifth, the largest private land owner in the US (sierra pacifffic timber) did not "save up money" and buy the land, they used state governors to help them "steal" it from the people. They inheritted their land from the mommy corporation (person) the union pacific rail-road which got the land for NOTHING. So most land was not "purchased" by "people" with "money" by honorable means.
Sixth, By what right do you own your land. Was your land not stolen from Natives? Oh thats right, thats a different sort of hostile possesion.
Eighth, Contracts are not "color of law" they are law. Further, easements have been around for a long time and will be. They are most definitly law. Why would you assume that usery and interest is not law???
In closing, thank you to anyone who claims any land back from those asses