Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Codee
First land belongs to those on it. It is the propper position of the land to be possesed by those living on it.
|
No - the land belongs to the lawful owner. Property rights are the foundation of law. It appears you do not support liberty, individual rights, or the law.
Quote:
|
Second, prescriptive easements are not contractual. A contract would actually prevent this type of easement.
|
Not so.
A prescriptive easement arises if someone uses part of your property with your permission. It can also occur when you use part of your neighbor's property without approval. A prescriptive easement involves only the loss of use of part of a property, for example a pathway or driveway.
The legal test to acquire a prescriptive easement of another owner is that the use must be open, not secret, notorious, clearly observable, hostile, without the landowner's consent and continuous without interruption for the number of years required by state law.
Given the above, a prescriptive easement can be either a contractual agreement or adverse possession.
Quote:
|
Third, My "industry" of land surveying does nothing. We simply describe the land for someone and prepare a description of the property for them in an exhibit. Property owners are the ones that "steal" from eachother, not the land surveyors.
|
Not - by your own words, you receive pay from the companies that violate property rights of the land owners by adversely obtaining easements under color of law.
Quote:
|
Fourth, not all prescriptive easements are for Right of ways.
|
An easement IS a right-of-way.
http://www.dictionary.com
ease·ment ( P ) Pronunciation Key (zmnt)
n.
Law. A right, such as a right of way, afforded a person to make limited use of another's real property.
Quote:
|
Fifth, the largest private land owner in the US (sierra pacifffic timber) did not "save up money" and buy the land, they used state governors to help them "steal" it from the people. They inheritted their land from the mommy corporation (person) the union pacific rail-road which got the land for NOTHING. So most land was not "purchased" by "people" with "money" by honorable means.
|
Why would the above matter to you - you propose doing the same thing.
Quote:
|
Sixth, By what right do you own your land. Was your land not stolen from Natives? Oh thats right, thats a different sort of hostile possesion.
|
No - my land was obtained by the Texas Republic as war prize against Mexico.