[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by HenryBowman

How True. One cannot submit to the "sun" and "The Son" at the same time.

Since you have resorted to the dirty tactics here, which are:

1) taking my premises;

2) taking my conclusion in a different section of the Post;

3) adding your, own conclusion;

4) making a claim on my behalf that I am responsible for all 3 above, while, in real truth, only 1) & 2) are reality!

Therefore, based on the evidence on record for all to see, I state that you have practiced deceit vs. me.


Deceit in this case is 3) & 4).

This is one of very common tactics widely used by the politicians, attorneys, judges, and, now, you.

To those who practice deceit, it is my right and responsibility to rebut accordingly.

I do so here but by my ways, which are not based on deceit but are fair and straight.


I, further, express my strong opinion that, truly, spiritual individuals or any one who uses honest means, do not practice deceit.

Therefore, I do not believe in spirituality of any one, who claims it by quoting the parts of the Bible and great men, while acting contrary to that.

I am, also, cautious of those who quote too much without expressing their, own mind as that, to me is an indication of the attempt to hide behind the glory of the "Scriptures," as if that makes you a part of it.


Spirituality is not based on quotations; it is based on how you act every day even if never quoted one phrase from the Bible and such or ever went to the House of Warship!

I believe so 100%.


Furthermore, as your deceit cannot succeed, I would state why?

I have a proof on record as well that I have never called the Sun my or any one's master.

Pard me, but you lied.

My main and CONSISTENT idea revolves around the notion that the Sun can help all to develop the Higher Awareness, extra sensory perception, and trigger a state of Harmony and Balance.
Then, I began proving why.

As that notion, (of the Sun) obviously, based on your conduct, disturbs you very much, I can conclude that the Sunlight irritates some part of your nature, as you oppose the stated above notion by your writings on record.

That what I have perceived and do not believe that I am the only one.

Any one who is disturbed by the Sunlight in that sense is, in my opinion...

Inquisition(ers) quoted too and very well.

1 Peter 2:9
But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;

John 8:12
"Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life."


You do not even understand what you quote, as only blindly repeat.

Why did I make such statement?
Well, I would present your, "own" quote to you,

...Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the worldJesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world...

Obviously, even Jesus referred to light.
If I am not mistaken Jesus said these words on Earth under the Sun.
Didn't he?


Which object did provide that light upon the Earth upon which Jesus walked when he said these words?

Your flashlight or the Sun maybe?

If you claim God provides light, fine, but through what does he provide such?

Out of nowhere through nothing or via stars and the Sun, as one of the stars?
This is the key point and answer to your "logic."

John 12:46
"I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on me should not abide in darkness."

Again, the word "light" is mentioned as you quote but do not see, you talk but do not hear, you try and you fail to reflect the spirit of the messages quoted.
Why do you engage yourself in the exercise of such futility then?

When quote, at least, try to quote, then, what defends your position - not what knocks it down.

On the opposing side:

2 Corinthians 11:14
"for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light."

This is an incomplete phrase.
Do you know, yourself, what you tried to imply by it?

Gain some bravery, finally, and use your, own mind and debate rationally by your logic on top of quotations - do not dive into them, as you suffocate there and can't get beyond them to the fresh air of the free writing.

Do you know who Satan is and what was implied by that term?
Do you?

Please do not quote back but use your, own knowledge if can.
Do you truly know Satan, where he is, or, you, just, repeat the Church Lady?

Beware the "angel" of "light" folks. All that glimmers is not gold.

I am not surprised. How consistent of you.
.


continued below